|
|
VIEUX BILOXY and ENVIRONS: 1720-1721
Until Dr. Val Husley
recently presented me with "The Voyage to Louisiana (1720-1724) of
Franquet de Chaville", the only description of French Colonial
Ocean Springs that I had read was in Richebourg Gaillard McWilliam's,
Iberville's Gulf Journals (1981). Charles Franquet de
Chaville, a French engineer, was assigned to Louisiana with Adrian de
Pauger (d. 1726) and Chevalier de Boispinel (d.1723) to work under
Chief Engineer of the Company of the Indies, Pierre Leblond de La Tour
(d. 1723).
Leblond de La Tour drew the
plans for Vieux Biloxy (Ocean Springs), Fort Louis at Nouveau Biloxy
(Biloxi), and Nouvelle Orleans (New Orleans). Fort Louis, which was
located west of the Biloxi Lighthouse, was never completed as the
Louisiana capital was moved to New Orleans in 1722. Monsieur de
Chaville arrived in the Louisiana Colony first at Ile Dauphine
(Dauphine Island) aboard the Dromadaire. He then went to the
natural harbor at Isle aux Vaisseau (Ship Island) before disembarking
at Vieux Biloxy (Ocean Springs) in December 1720.
Franquet de Chaville like
his fellow engineers eventually went to New Orleans. He assisted
Ignace Francois Broutin (d. 1751), who in 1745, would design the
second Ursuline Convent, on several projects. The most noted was the
"Plan of the Chapitoulas" (1724). It was a map of the Ste. Reine
Concession up river from colonial New Orleans. Noted architect and
architectural historian of New Orleans, Samuel Wilson, stated the
following concerning the draftsmanship and coloring of the Broutin-de
Chaville map of the Chapitoulas:
It seems almost incredible
that such a large and fine drawing could be made in the wilderness
that was Louisiana in 1724 but other drawings of comparable quality
were produced by Leblond de La Tour and his associates from the time
they arrived in Biloxi in December 1720. Their draftsmanship was of
the same high quality that marked the work of the architects and
engineers of early eighteenth-century France, and Broutin, by this
"plan of the Chapitoulas", proved himself to be one of the best.
The following was
generously translated by Madame Eileen Za of Ocean Springs and is the
Franquet de Chaville description of Ocean Springs and the Mississippi
Gulf Coast in late 1720 and early 1721.
Old Biloxi is situated at
the back of a bay surrounded by marsh. The land that we settled on
(occupied) is a plateau, stretching for about 2400 feet. It was the
only place we could see without any trees. Those who had recently
arrived from France had built cabins for themselves there. The only
house, that is to say a building or barracks worthy of the name, that
was to be seen was that occupied by the Directors. All others were
built in a style I have described later.
As far as age goes, this
post was the oldest, according to the Commander, established at the
time they discovered the mouth of the river in 1702. It was occupied a
second time after Dauphin Island was abandoned. Hunting and fishing
are abundantly rewarded, deer among others, is very good. It is
certainly the best eating when cooked on a spit. The fish which is
caught in the bay is called red fish and is the very best. It is
larger than a large carp and its flesh is very firm. The scales are
like those of a carp except that they are red. The Commander and the
Directors were always well supplied with red fish for their table.
Since they felt honored to invite newly arrived officers, I ate there
almost the whole time during my stay.
Up until now, I have not
touched on what happened, but now will try to fulfill my mission.
After having recovered from the fatigue of the journey, I was ordered
to report to New Biloxi, which lies opposite the anchorage of Ship
Island. Everyone sent from France debarked there to rest, while
waiting for boats to be built to take them to their destinations.
We started work by cutting
down a large number of trees to build barracks. Each one made his own.
After each person had built his own shelter, we began work on lodgings
for the Directors. A warehouse was built to hold the goods, which had
been unloaded on the sand. This work was cheerfully begun. All the
workers inspired by the same feelings, gladly undertook to build the
foundations of a new town. In truth, everything needed to encourage
them in this work was provided. Bread and wine were doled out in
abundance. The weather was calm, neither too hot nor too cold, just
right. Everything was fine at the beginning. But this happy period did
not last. The heat was excessive Boats did not arrive. Food was cut
back for the workers. Foolishly, no more was distributed to them. They
fell ill. Work stopped. Each man was to busy looking after himself,
hunting and fishing for food. To all these troubles were added the
greatest of all-homesick. In less than six months our work force was
halved. Colonies that had been intended to house other concessions
fared no better. Most of the good workers died, which meant they could
not make the necessary voyage to the site indicated by the Company
since they had already eaten most of their food. The only thing they
could do was to wait on the river bank for new help in travelling
further on.
During this period of
distress, we received no news of any other ship, and it seemed as
though one would never come, that we had been completely forgotten,
which doubled our worries, and caused many me to desert and flee from
this unhappy Colony, going to live among the Spanish, who offered them
asylum. This annoying predicament led us all to think differently
depending on how much interest we had in the success or failure of the
enterprise. But we were united on one point-we expected nothing good.
The chief engineer
unburdened himself on the subject of the Company. Rather than find
something that would reward him for all his work, he felt, sadly, only
the uselessness of the endeavor, and the final disgrace, he had
nothing to work with. He had been told in France that he would have a
heap of material necessary for the proposed projects. Instead of the
expected abundance, he saw only a frightful lack of just about
everything. Time to him to short to ensure the definite establishing a
Colony. He calculated the enormous expense already incurred, which was
totally useless, and the further expense, which would be necessary. He
was shocked (horrified) by the amount, especially as everything at
this point was not resolved, not even the final decision on the
location of the post, whose final situation was still not assured
since the advantages of this particular site had not yet been combined
with those of the whole coast. He was slow, as were we all, to
recognize this fact. The memoranda on these points could not satisfy
us. It was easy to see the spirit that dictated them: self pride
combined with a vested interest played a large part, and truth was
nowhere to be seen.
To commit oneself to this
project any longer could have meticulous consequences. We were
therefore sent off to make a meticulous visit to the coast. One of my
comrades was ordered to sail down the Mississippi and carefully
observe the mouth of the river. You will find this description later.
I was sent to Ship Island
and Cat Island to map them both. I left in a small boat with six
sailors and nine workmen to help me in my operations. I was provided
with food for 15 days, bacon, biscuits, and brandy. It was August.
Judge for yourself whether we needed anything to keep us warm! We
could almost burn up like matches.
First I went to Ship
Island. I made a map and took soundings in the anchorage. Here is a
brief description.
Description of Ship Island
This island is situated on
the same latitude as Dauphin Island, lying the same distance from
shore and in the same direction. The two are separated by another
island, called Horn Island. The soil of the three islands is similar,
not good for cultivating food.
Ship Island is shaped like
a fichu having two points, each about a league long with no trees. The
center has a few pine trees and some small oaks, for about a league.
The whole island is only three leagues long by one-half league wide.
There is a pond 5500 feet across which connects with the sea. Monsieur
d'Iberville, captain of the King's fleet, named it Ship Island, when
he moored there when he discovered the mouth of the Mississippi River.
The harbor is in the bay
formed by the west and north points of the island. It can hold a
goodly number of ships moored in 20 feet of water, with sandy bottom,
sheltered from the sea and winds by the island, having only to fear
those winds off the land (from the north). But the over all picture is
good. Besides the tide there does not rise very high. There is a sand
bank which lies ENE and WSW about 5000 feet in size. Water depth there
is about thirteen feet, with a base of hard grey sand. To avoid this
bank and arrive at a good mooring place, this is the route to take:
When passing the western
point of the island, keep at a distance of about 1 1/2 cables, where
the water is about 30-40 feet deep. Sail along the length of the
island, taking care to keep a little distance from shore because of
the strips of land which stick out more as they near the back of the
bay. When you are a quarter of a league from the trees, go NNE to
moor. As far as safety from enemies is concerned, it would be
difficult to hide the ships.
Fish is plentiful and can
easily be caught in a net. We caught many that resembled the fish
along the French coast.
When I had finished all
that I had been ordered to do, I left to do the same at Cat Island,
which is about 2 leagues distant. Bad weather prevented me from
examining it exactly as I would have liked, as it was struck by its
poor location. It is riddled with marshes, which connect to the sea,
and make its use impracticable. The whole time that I was there strong
winds led me to find it very disagreeable. Food was getting short and
we were reduced to eating wild cats and some oysters, which abound
along the coast.
Fatigue was a major problem
for all of us, but especially me. I suffered on all sides, sleeping on
the sand, and eating bad food did not suit my temperament at all, and
I paid dearly for it after this tour of duty. I was very sick. My
comrade arrived some time after his trip to the mouth of the river
with a detailed map of the various practicable openings, which had
been unknown until then for ordinary Company vessels!
The Commander in Chief who
knew this began to tell everyone not to believe it as it was just an
idea of the engineer. Why he did this we did not know. The chief
engineer even though he got along well with my comrade, the engineer,
did not know what to make of this contradiction, and the denials that
he received daily on every issue, and he had a hard time trying to
discover the truth. He had been refused, on our arrival, admission to
council meetings, which he blamed on the Directors. He was not allowed
to enjoy the same privileges that they enjoyed by virtue of the new
orders contradictory to those he carried. He realized that the man's
maneuvers were completely sincere which led to such inner unhappiness
that eventually it killed him. Still, he followed the advice given him
and worked with the Biloxi post, less out of confidence in this
advice, than to pass time while waiting for a reply from France to the
memo he had sent regarding the situation at this post and also
regarding the mouth of the river.
The Franquet de Chaville
report on his travels and work in French Colonial Louisiana is over
forty pages in length. This excerpt represents eight pages. de
Chaville left New Olreans and returned to La Rochelle, France in 1724.
By 1764, Franquet de Chaville carried the title, Chief Engineer and
Director of Fortifications. In 1765, he was named Director of
Engineers.
Merci beaucoup a' Madame
Eileen Za for her excellent translation of the French text.
Page Two ~
Page Three
REFERENCES:
Jean M. Farnsworth and Ann
M. Masson, The Architecture of Colonial Louisiana: Collected
Essays of Samuel Wilson, Jr. F.A.I.A., (University of SW
Louisiana-1987), p. 24, p. 224-225,
Journal de la Societe Des
Americanistes De Paris, "Le Voyage En Louisiane de Franquet de
Chaville (1720-1724)", pp. 20-27.
Personal Communication:
Dr. Val Husley
Eileen Za
REFERENCES:
BOOKS
Carl Brasseaux, A
Comparative View of Frenck Louisiana, 1699-1762: The Journals of
Pierre Le Moyne d'Iberville and Jean-Jacques-Blaise d'Abbadie, (The
Center For Louisiana Studies @ USL: Lafayette, Louisiana-1979), 159
pages.
Laville Bremer, Biloxi Historical Sketch, (General Printing Company:
New Orleans-1931), 42 pages.Glenn R. Conrad, Immigration and War,
Louisiana: 1718-1721, (USL: Lafayette, Louisiana-1970), 55 pages.
Glenn R. Conrad, Historical Journal of the Settlement of the French in
Louisiana, (USL: Lafayette, Louisiana-1971), 272 pages.
Patricia K. Galloway, La Salle and His Legacy, (University Press:
Jackson, Mississippi-1982), 260 pages.
Jay Higginbotham, Fort Maurepas: The Birth of Louisiana, (Colonial
Books: Mobile-1968), 93 pages.
----------------, The
Journal of Sauvole, (Colonial Books: Mobile-1969), 70 pages.
----------------, Old
Mobile: Fort Louis de la Louisiane (1702-1711), (Museum of the City of
Mobile, Publication No. 4: Mobile-1977), 585 pages.
Henri Joutel, Journal of La
Salle's Last Voyage, (Corinth Books: New York-1962), 187 pages.
Robert S. Weddle, The
French Thorn: Rival Explorers in the Spanish Sea (1682-1762), (Texas
A.& M. Press: College Station, Texas-1991), 435 pages. |